FLTF Files Motion to Dismiss and Opposition
Claim of Appeal vs. Application for Leave to Appeal
Under Michigan law, a litigant has the right to request a higher court to review errors of a lower court. On July 11, 2024, Heron Cove Association (HCA) filed a request asking the Michigan Court of Appeals to review Judge Beale’s decision. HCA filed both a "Claim of Appeal" and an "Application for Leave to Appeal" in the Michigan Court of Appeals.
A “Claim of Appeal” asserts an appellant has the right to have the Court of Appeals review the decision of a lower court (“right to an appeal”). In such case, the Court of Appeals must hear the case.
In contrast, where a lower court decision cannot be appealed as a matter of right, an appellant can ask permission for the Court of Appeals to invoke its jurisdiction and review a lower court’s decision. In such instances, the Court of Appeal has discretion whether or not to hear the case. This process requires the submission of an “Application for Leave” (i.e. permission) to invoke the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals.
FLTF maintains that because the matter before Judge Beale was an administrative appeal of the counties’ decision following a special assessment hearing, HCA may only seek review by application to the Court of Appeals. On July 24th, we filed our answer in opposition of HCA’s Application for Leave to Appeal. In connection with HCA’s Claim of Appeal, we filed a motion to dismiss. In both instances, we requested immediate consideration by the Court of Appeals.
HCA Claim of Appeal --> FLTF Filed Motion to Dismiss
HCA Application for Leave to Appeal --> FLTF Filed Answer in Opposition
|