On October 2, 2021, Georgia held its municipal elections, regarded by the opposition as a referendum for the snap parliamentary elections. According to the April 19 agreement, mediated by Chales Michel, which urged the opposition to return to parliament after months of boycott following the disputed 2020 parliamentary elections: “...early parliamentary elections shall be called in 2022 if the Georgian Dream (GD) party receives less than 43% of valid proportional votes in the October 2021 local self-government elections”. In the month of July, the ruling GD party abandoned the EU-brokered deal, with the party leader Irakli Kobakhidze claiming it “served its mission and exhausted itself”. However, despite GD’s withdrawal from the April 19 agreement, the opposition continued with the October 2 municipal elections as a referendum and centered their pre-election campaign around the message of not allowing the GD to receive 43% of the votes.
However, the overall proportional results of the highly contested municipal elections turned out to be successful for the GD, as they managed to garner 46.7% of the total votes, compared to 30.7% support of the opposition front-runner United National Movement (UNM). However, the GD failed to win the Mayoral elections in the first round in major cities, including the capital Tbilisi, and run-offs are expected in 20 municipalities. GD even lost its majority in five municipal assemblies (including in the large cities of Batumi, Zugdidi and Rustavi) in the first round of the elections. In the capital Tbilisi, incumbent mayor Kakha Kaladze won 45% of the votes, while the chairman of the opposition UNM, Nika Melia, received 34%. With no candidate winning more than 50%, Tbilisi will hold a second round of elections on October 30.
The OSCE/ODIHR published preliminary findings regarding the elections and noted that Georgian municipal elections were “generally well-administered, held against the backdrop of a protracted political crisis and characterised by hardened polarisation”, and technical aspects were managed efficiently. In terms of the pre-election campaign, OSCE/ODIHR stated that the parties were able “to campaign freely in a competitive environment”, however according to the OSCE/ODIHR, the campaign period was “marred by wide-spread and consistent allegations of intimidation, vote-buying, pressure on candidates and voters, and an unlevel playing field”; also, the OSCE/ODIHR underscored that a “significant imbalance in resources, insufficient oversight of campaign finances and an undue advantage of incumbency” benefited the ruling party. The OSCE/ODIHR assessed the election day as “generally calm and orderly”, which “proceeded in an orderly and transparent manner”, although there were “some procedural issues, particularly during counting”, “pervasive misuse of citizen observers as party representatives'' and some isolated violent incidents. The OSCE/ODIHR also highlighted that “groups of individuals potentially influencing voters outside some polling stations were of concern”. Regarding the media ecosystem, the OSCE/ODIHR noted that it was “highly polarised and provided little analytical reporting and selective coverage” which limited voters’ ability to make an informed choice, and cases of intimidation and violence against journalists were of concern. Additionally, the OSCE/ODIHR mentioned that ethnic minority issues had been generally left behind during the election campaign and that national minorities remained underrepresented.
The Council of Europe's Congress of Local and Regional Authorities, which also observed the municipal election, assessed the elections more or less similarly. According to the CoE, the election day was “overall calm, orderly, transparent and well organised without major shortcomings”, however the political environment was very polarized and there has been an “increase in verbal aggression, hate speech and fake news on social media during the election campaign”. David Eray, head of the delegation of the CoE concluded that “this polarisation had a paralysing effect on local democracy which, in fact, has been taken hostage by the overall national political situation. Against this background, this poll was a missed opportunity for local democracy in Georgia”. He also voiced criticism about the efficiency of new regulations aimed at increasing the number of women on candidate lists.
The major local CSOs and election watchdogs the International Society for Fair Elections and Democracy (ISFED), Georgian Young Lawyers’ Association (GYLA), and Transparency International Georgia issued preliminary reports (TI report, GYLA report, ISFED report) outlining the procedural irregularities and violations inside and outside the polling stations. Violations of the secrecy of the ballot, tracking of voters by unauthorized persons, voting with improper voter identification documents, allowing a voter to cast a ballot without checking for indelible ink, and failure to follow inking procedures before voting were recorded in the polling stations, while gathering of party coordinators, voter mobilization, tracking/noting of voters and alleged vote buying were observed outside the polling stations.
The election to some extent has been overshadowed by the arrest of exiled former President Mikheil Saakashvili, founder of the UNM party. In an unexpected Facebook post early on October 1, Saakashvili said “Good morning, Georgia. From Georgia after eight years.” In another video posted on his Facebook page, Saakashvili addressed the public from the coastal city Batumi and announced that he would arrive in the capital Tbilisi soon. Saakashvili called on his supporters to gather on Rustaveli Avenue, Tbilisi’s main thoroughfare, on October 3, the day after local elections and urged the public to vote for his UNM party, or smaller “real” opposition parties, except ex-Prime Minister Giorgi Gakharia’s “For Georgia” and other political entities that “receive money from Bidzina Ivanishvili.”
The Interior Ministry, as well as the ruling GD party leaders, denied any possibility of Saakashvili being in Georgia and called the videos fake, with the Chair of the ruling party, Irakli Kobakhidze calling Saakashvili a “clown” and insisting that the video footage “was not recorded in Georgia.” Though, “surprisingly”, on the same night of October 1, PM Irakli Garibashvili, during the special briefing, declared that former President Mikheil Saakashvili had been arrested in Tbilisi. Two days later, on October 3, in a late-night interview with pro-government Imedi TV, PM Garibashvili talked about the arrest of former President Mikheil Saakashvili and notoriously noted that “Saakashvili better behave, otherwise, we will bring more articles [charges against him] and others [Saakashvili’s allies] will share the same destiny as well.”
Before and after Saakashvili’s arrest, many have speculated in Georgia that the incumbent president Zourabishvili would pardon the former President. However, President Salome Zurabishvili made a statement late on October 1, saying that she will never pardon former President Saakashvili. Apart from recalling the “crimes” that Saakashvili’s “regime has committed”, President Zurabishvili accused him of attempts to destabilize the country amid October 2 local elections.
|