|
Telling these patients what they want to hear to capture a fee is a profound ethical violation that damages your reputation when outcomes disappoint. Conversely, some patients have been pushed toward surgery by orthodontists uncomfortable with complex TAD mechanics or by oral surgeons whose financial interests favor surgical solutions. Your responsibility is accurate diagnosis delivered with empathy: clearly distinguishing cases where TADs offer genuine equivalent outcomes from cases where surgery remains the superior option regardless of patient preference.
Building a second opinion practice requires transparent communication that prioritizes patient outcomes over case acquisition. Develop a structured consultation protocol that documents your evaluation criteria, explains exactly why you're recommending or declining TAD treatment, and provides written rationale patients can share with their original providers. When you tell a patient "I've reviewed your records and surgery genuinely is your best option," your credibility becomes unassailable. When you identify a borderline case where TADs can deliver comparable results, you've earned a grateful patient for life who'll send every surgery-terrified friend directly to your door.
|