|
While all eyes were focused on the Western Hemisphere two weeks ago, many have begun to look back eastward to Iran. In what appear to be the largest protests in the history of the Islamic Republic, Iranians of all backgrounds and ages have flooded the streets, replacing the flag of the Islamic Republic with the Lion and Sun and demanding the end of the Ayatollah’s brutal reign. In response, the Ayatollah has massacred his own people, with estimates of Iranian deaths in the thousands.
In response to the Islamic Republic’s brutality, President Trump issued a series of warnings, suggesting if the regime continues to kill protesters he will respond on their behalf. Given in his first term President Trump enforced President Obama’s redline against chemical weapons use in Syria and in his second term President Trump enforced his redline in Venezuela, these threats should not be taken lightly. And yet – what do these threats really mean? How can the United States both protect protesters, ensure our word is taken seriously, deny Iran continued power projection capabilities, and avoid getting caught up in another long-term conflict in the Middle East?
The United States could consider targeting elements of the regime repression apparatus through either a precise physical strike – similar to Operation Midnight Hammer – or a cyber-attack to cripple their ability to surveil and identify protesters. But as we and our partners explained in our Iran primer in 2024, reversing the Islamic Republic’s capability and willingness to threaten American security isn’t just about maximum pressure against the regime – it’s about maximum support for the people.
By leaning into support for the Iranian people, the United States could help protect lives – President Trump’s stated objective – without risking broader escalation. This approach is why Congress recently agreed to a deal, which has passed the House and is awaiting action in the Senate, to appropriate $643 million for the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM) despite the Trump administration’s attempts to defund the institution. While it remains ripe for reform, even the administration recognized its utility when it recalled nearly 40 laid off staffers to VOA Farsi after Operation Midnight Hammer to counter regime propaganda. At the same time, providing access to the internet through Starlink, supplying VPNs, and continuing a number of programs under the Open Technology Fund that allow the circumvention of government restrictions are important steps to ensure the Iranian people can communicate with each other, can share their message with the rest of the world, and importantly, can hear America's support for them.
Dictators thrive under the cover of darkness. As Senator Vandenberg once said, the United States can and should be the “beacon in the world’s dark night.” We should heed his message, and his warning too: that “if a beacon is to be lighted at all, it had better be lighted before it is too late.”
-Carrie Filipetti, Executive Director of the Vandenberg Coalition
|