This past Wednesday was George Balanchine's 121st birthday.
Many of you who are reading this know that the majority of my ballet training was at Balanchine's school, the School of American Ballet. SAB was not where I had my first introduction to ballet, though. In fact, I had already felt a strong compulsion to dance before I even knew who George Balanchine was, let alone that he had built a magnificent school and company and scores of even more magnificent ballets.
But SAB is where I discovered why I needed to dance. And it was from my SAB teachers, particularly those who had themselves learned directly from and danced the ballets of Mr. B, that I learned what makes the Balanchine way of dancing-- and the principles on which it rests-- so glorious.
Although I never danced in the New York City Ballet, most of my career was in companies that orbited, however obliquely at times, around Balanchine's work and aesthetics. And while I did learn and perform works in a variety of forms and by a huge range of choreographers from ultra-classical to ultra-modern, dancing a Balanchine ballet always made my body go, "Ahh... yes." It a relief, in a way, because even a Balanchine ballet that I had never previously learned would, reliably, feel right and familiar even as I made its acquaintance for the first time. It was a homecoming.
I'm finding it hard to describe the way it felt, to me, to learn a new Balanchine ballet. Maybe it was like finding new ways to speak in a language I'd grown up using. New vocabulary, phrasing, idioms, accents and parts of speech, new dialects, but all with the ease, smoothness and rightness of tongue-in-groove parquetry.
|