First off, a belated Happy Easter to you, if you celebrate. If you also had Monday off, we're a bit jealous - not going to lie.
Anywho, this week we're talking blog post frequency.
How Much Should You Be Posting?
There are few topics in the blogging world that people are more opinionated on, and less sure of, than blog post frequency.
Of course, the quick answer is the obvious one - the more content the better.
However, that sentence really should read the more quality content the better. In the early days of blogging, "the daily blog" was a thing, and with little to no competition from an SEO perspective, people were essentially able to rank with their glorified diaries.
Man, wouldn't that be nice if that were still the case?
It's All About Intent
As with pretty much everything in the blogging world, your blog post frequency will be guided by what you're trying to accomplish.
A celebrity news gossip site, for example, is likely only concerned with staying up-to-date and pumping out as much content as humanly possible. Whereas a travel site would have a much greater pay-off from building an in-depth city guide than news related snippets about a city (though those style articles can be good for getting backlinks).
What Do the Numbers Say?
A recent study from the Marketing Insider Group suggested that the highest results for traffic and conversions applied to sites that published 2-4 times per week, with 11 posts per month being the sweet spot.
Again, we feel it's a bit too base to just talk about the number of posts without talking about the quality of said posts, so take it with a grain of salt.
Hubspot, which is more small business than content creator facing, recently suggested that marketers should consider whether they're trying to achieve organic traffic or brand awareness, as that would affect their approach.
Their opinion was that for true growth in organic traffic you should "publish as much optimized content as possible." They suggested small blogs post 3-4 new articles per week and large blogs post 4-5 times a week (a mixture of new and updated posts.)
For brand awareness, they said to focus more on "diversifying content and providing useful information." Small blogs should post 1-2 new posts per week and large blogs should post 3-4 times per week (a mixture of new and updated posts)
Most conversations on blog post frequency have to veer into the subjective. Sure, posting more might be better, but you also need to consider blogger burnout. What's the most you can do in a sustainable way? - that's the real question.
Not to mention, there are plenty of examples of people who are crushing it by actively ignoring blog post frequency entirely. Take Brian Dean, for example. He only has about 40 posts on his site, releases a new post perhaps every month or six weeks, and yet he gets millions of hits a year because his content is so in-depth.
Our expert for today, Ryan Tyler Thomas, would very much agree with Brian's approach.
Inside the Mainframe
...because experts have expertise
How much of a factor is blog post frequency in your opinion?
"Frequency is not a factor. You're better off writing highly useful, highly sharable, evergreen content than writing weak content regularly. Great content takes research, it takes time, and above all it takes a editorial focus that makes it worth reading.
Don't be afraid to link and share old content from your archives when its relevant or timely again. If a topic comes back into fashion, update your high performing older posts, and put them back into circulation.
We forget, as marketers and creatives that just because we made it and have stated our point of view that not everyone had read it, and not everyone found it relevant to them when we hit publish.
Your job isn't publishing every Monday, it's publishing the best possible content and making sure it's discoverable when its needed." - Ryan Tyler Thomas, Head of Integrated SEO, Go Squab
Finally, the caching/script optimization plugin WP Rocket* is having a 20% off sale running through April 13th. This one helped our site speed a fair bit!
RYDE vs Copytrack - Comparing Image Monitoring Companies
In the past, we've shared reviews of the image monitoring companies Copytrack and RYDE*. Both of these companies track your images online and allows you to invoice infringers to help protect your copyright.
But as with all services, they are not created equally.
In this one, we thought we'd compare the two side-by-side to highlight the pros and cons of each.
No matter which service you ultimately go with, one thing is certain- you really need to be monitoring your images online!
That's it for the week! Check your inbox next week for another update from This Week in Blogging.
As always, if you have any questions, comments, or feedback, feel free to reply directly to this email. Jeremy's WSET Level 3 wine exam is next Tuesday and he is up to his neck in flashcards (and partially consumed bottles), so Chris will get back to you this week.
Disclosures: Links inside this newsletter may be affiliate in nature. They are denoted with an asterisk (*). Any sponsored content beyond this will be clearly noted in their respective section(s). All opinions are solely by their respective authors. More information can be found in our Terms and Conditions.
This Week in Blogging PO Box 100106, Pittsburgh Pennsylvania 15233 United States
You are receiving this email as you joined our newsletter via our site or social channels. You may unsubscribe at any time.