Yehuda Lave, Spiritual Advisor and Counselor

You Create the Place and the willingness to find G-d

In 1856, Rabbi Avraham Yaakov Friedman of Sadugura, was arrested because of a libel and was kept in prison.

"I am permitted to serve the Almighty undisturbed," Rabbi Avraham Yaakov told his visitors, "What difference does it make whether I am here, or anywhere else?"

His father in law, Rabbi Aharon Perlow of Karlin, who was allowed to stay with him for a while in his cell, asked him, "How do you feel in this awful place?"

Rabbi Avraham Yaakov replied, "Does the place one is in make a difference? The Almighty's glory fills the earth. He is everywhere. Even here, in this awful place."

Rabbi Friedman was obvioiusly on a very high level. Those of us that are not, have to use these stories as an inspiration for us to walk in G-d's ways.

One of the ways for a man to walk in G-d's ways is to be married. There is no obligation on a part of a woman to be married, but there is an obligaiton  on the man. How could that be, who would men marry if women did not want to? This is how G-d created the dance of the sexes. Woman naturally want to be married to feel secure. Men don't naturally want to be married, because it means, responsiblity and caring and growing up out of being a little boy and being there for your wife and children. This is how G-d designed the world. A religious man does not want to be a playboy, he wants to walk in G-d's ways by getting married and being a supportive husband. Of course G-d has to send you a woman who wants you to be her husband. I said last week I was in Prague on Friday, but didn't say why I was going. I was going to meet my new soul mate's parents and to ask her to marry me. She did and I had a wonderful week of love in the romatic city of Prague, Czech. I didn't know much about Prague before I left, but it is considered the Paris of central Europe. A city for lovers. We had a beautiful week and Mariam agreed to be my wife. She will be gone a few weeks but hopefully we will marry soon. G-d can change lives, in just a moment as Yoseph found out as he was brought before the Pharoh and become the vicory, and in one week, a couple can find love.

 

Love Yehuda Lave

Observations on Growing Older

TODAY IS THE OLDEST YOU'VE EVER BEEN, YET THE YOUNGEST YOU'LL EVER BE, SO ENJOY THIS DAY WHILE IT LASTS.

~Your kids are becoming you...and you don't like them...but your grandchildren are perfect!

~Going out is good.. Coming home is better!

~When people say you look "Great"... they add "for your age!"

~When you needed the discount, you paid full price. Now you get discounts on everything... movies, hotels, flights, but you're too tired to use them.

~You forget names .... but it's OK because other people forgot they even knew you!!!

~The 5 pounds you wanted to lose is now 15 and you have a better chance of losing your keys--than the 15 pounds.

~You realize you're never going to be really good at anything .... especially golf.

~Your spouse is counting on you to remember things you don't remember.

~The things you used to care to do, you no longer care to do, but you really do care that, you don't care to do them anymore.

~Your husband sleeps better on a lounge chair with the TV blaring than he does in bed. It's called his "pre-sleep."

~Remember when your mother said, "Wear clean underwear in case you GET in an accident"? Now you bring clean underwear in case you HAVE an accident!

~You used to say, "I hope my kids GET married... Now, "I hope they STAY married!"

~You miss the days when everything worked with just an "ON" and "OFF" switch..

~When GOOGLE, ipod, email, modem were unheard of, and a mouse was something that made you climb on a table.

~You tend to use more 4 letter words ... "what?"..."when?"... ???

~Now that you can afford expensive jewelry, it's now not safe to wear it.

~Your husband has a night out with the guys, but he's home by 9:00 P.M. Next week it will be 8:30 p.m.

~You read 100 pages into a book before you realize you've read it.

~Notice everything they sell in stores is "sleeveless"?!!!

~What used to be freckles are now liver spots.

~Everybody whispers.

~Now that your husband has retired .... you'd give anything if he'd find a job!

~You have 3 sizes of clothes in your closet...2 of which you will never wear.

Leonard Cohen - Sisters of Mercy - live 1972

"Sisters of Mercy", live footage from the 1972 Leonard Cohen tour documentary "Bird On A Wire". The context of the clip (and a subject running throughout the doc) is the gradual disintegration of the band's sound system, such that harmony singers Donna Washburn & Jennifer Warnes are invited to sing over Cohen's shoulder into one of the last operational microphones. The result is this beautiful rendition.

Leonard Cohen’s Debut Album Turns 50

this week. It was not immediately or universally loved.

“I don’t think I could ever tolerate all of it,” Arthur Schmidt wrote in Rolling Stone. “There are three brilliant songs, one good one, three qualified bummers, and three are the flaming shits.”

Thankfully, time has been kinder to the album, and songs like “Suzanne,” “So Long Marianne” and “Sisters of Mercy” have gone on to open the hearts of generations. We need such heart-opening now more than ever, as Cohen himself have been trying to tell us for decades. But never too bluntly or too crudely—that would be sacrilegious to the Lord of Song.

“Whatever grip capitalism has on its constituents,” he mused in a 1994 interview, “it seems to be a more benign grip than any of the other systems that people have thought out. So I would resist, although not with a tremendous amount of interest in the matter, having it serve an anti-capitalist program. I think that a good song exists in very modest terms and also in Himalayan terms. I mean, it’s a thing to get you through the dishes. It provides a sound-track for your courting and for your solitude. That’s the modest element. Then there is an element in song which provides deep comfort and deep solace and stimulation for the imagination and courage. You can’t use it for something as deliberate as a program. It could be, but it falls away. A good song slips away from its dogma.”

Amen to that, brother. And now, to celebrate the album’s anniversary and infuse the fading year with a shot of much needed mercy, here is the man himself, in 1972, with Donna Washburn and Jennifer Warnes, warning us against leaving everything we cannot control:

Tablet Magazine

Leonard Cohen - Sisters of Mercy (Live in Israel 1972)

Leonard Cohen in Israel, "Marianne", live, 1972

Leonard Cohen's concert in Tel Aviv, 1972

Leonard Cohen Live In Israel 2009 [Full Concert]


In Memoriam of Mr. Leonard Cohen

This is three hours soiit is too big to give the picture directly.

Here is the link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWuaWBi0or4

Fair’ Does Not Mean ‘The Same’ By Rabbi Eliyahu Safran

Henry Ford became a very, very wealthy man by doing one thing well – not developing the Model T but devising a method by which that product could be produced each exactly like the one before it and the one after it with incredible efficiency and, therefore, reduced cost.

Ford developed the moving assembly line, a watershed moment in industrial capitalism. Thanks to Ford, we soon had efficiency and uniformity in products as diverse as cars, clothes, and hamburgers.

The ability to make many things the same is essential to quality control.

The benefits of such production soon found their way into every aspect of life. Modern public education is predicated on “producing” students with a standardized body of knowledge; students who know how to stand in a straight line, behave in an auditorium, and take their place as productive members of the community.

Behavioral problems are the result of individual students “not getting with the program.” Perhaps it is time that we more closely examine this perspective, this view that equates our children with products.

“And now your two sons, who were born to you in the land of Egypt before I came to you in Egypt, are mine; Ephraim and Menasheh shall be mine, as Reuben and Simeon…” (Bereishit 48:5).

In Yaakov’s blessing of Ephraim and Menasheh, we are presented with a refutation to our culture’s determination to mold children rather than encourage their individuality. Here, each child gets his own blessing. This is not a case of “one size fits all.” As every good parent or teacher knows, treating children the same is the absolute worst way to be fair and just. As one long-time educator reminded her colleagues, “You never have only twenty-five students in your class; you have twenty-five only students…”

That is, as a teacher you never have a singular class so much as a group of individuals. The goal should not be to mold them into a uniform sameness so much as to elevate each individual student.

In Bereishit, we see that Yaakov embraces this understanding. He treats these two grandsons with such care and tenderness, acknowledging their individuality and special-ness with his blessing. But wait! What about Yaakov’s other grandchildren? In blessing these two, is he “playing favorites”? It would be surprising if that were the case. After all, he had already paid a bitter price for his favoritism of Yosef over his other sons. Could he really be making the very same mistake with the next generation?

The Talmud (Shabbat 10b) references Yosef’s sale and its tragic aftermath when it teaches that one should never show favoritism among one’s children. Certainly Yaakov, having cried bitter tears during the years he was separated from his beloved son, learned this lesson well. But here he seems to be favoring these two over his other grandchildren. Even with these two he seems to favor the younger over the elder.

The crux of the matter is the confusion, so many seem to have between “sameness” and “fairness.” They are not the same thing. Indeed, to be fair, it is often necessary to treat individuals as, well, individuals. Which means treating them differently according to their needs.

Rav Yaakov Kaminetsky explains this in a way that is fundamental to an understanding of what it means to raise, educate, and guide children and students. Of course, he notes, there is a rule never to show favoritism. This is so basic as to amount to nothing more than common sense. But, he adds, the deeper truth is that “the exception proves the rule.” So while we are not to show favoritism, there are times when such “favoritism” speaks to the more fundamental truth.

Every parent, every teacher, knows there are children who require more time, more effort, more attention, more concern than other children. Would it make any sense, would it be more “fair” to treat such a child as any other?

Most children behave within the parameters we consider acceptable. They get up, clean their rooms, make their beds. They go to school and do their homework. They brush their teeth and show respect to their elders. And then there are those who… well, don’t.

Should we treat these “exceptions” as we do the others?

Rav Yaakov teaches us that the causes for this difference can be varied – physical, emotional, or psychological. We see these differences from a very young age. Some babies sleep through the night. Some cry. Good parenting suggests that a parent recognize the needs of his or her child and respond appropriately – which very often is different for each child. Some children need a peanut butter and jelly sandwich every day for lunch. Others, because of allergies, would become dangerously ill from the very same treatment.

The same, of course, is true in teaching. It is easy to teach a classroom full of high achievers and dedicated students. I would suggest that the measure of a good teacher isn’t in how well he teaches his strongest students but in how well he teaches his weakest ones; how well he responds to the needs and demands of the “difficult” student.

It is not the responsibility of those who are different to communicate that to us in a way we’re comfortable with. It is incumbent upon us to be sensitive and thoughtful enough to recognize how differences affect behavior. How did Yaakov know that Ephraim and Menasheh needed to be treated differently from his other grandchildren? By being thoughtful. He realized that these two grew up without the benefit of family and community. No grandparents, no Jewish friends or family; just two youngsters in the middle of Egypt – the middle of nowhere from a Jewish perspective. Surely children growing up away from family deserve a bit of extra attention when they finally meet their doting grandfather.

Even at this emotional meeting, Yaakov had the wisdom to discern the individual needs of the two and so favors Ephraim over Menasheh. As Rav Yaakov explains, Menasheh is the product of “ki nishani et kol amali v’et kol beit avi” (God made me forget all my hardship and all my father’s household). That is, he is an “old world child.” When Menasheh was born, Yosef was still sensitive to all the hardships, to all the trials and tribulations of his life. This child was, and remained, a reminder of his own home life. But Ephraim – “ki hifrani Elokim b’eretz onyee” (God made me fruitful in the land of my suffering) – is a child of Yosef’s “new world,” of new experiences and opportunities, of good times.

Of course Ephraim needs to be treated differently than Menasheh. Yaakov was sensitive enough to discern that if he were not treated differently, something bad could happen. He was sensitive and caring enough to know that without special handling he could be overwhelmed by pressure, just as we see in our own time as so many OTD children are crushed by the pressure of a system and community that should value and embrace them.

Yaakov “crosses his hands” because Ephraim was special.

Why can’t we likewise “cross our hands” in making sure our children don’t struggle with difficult futures?

Some children are born to play football, others to march in the band. Some girls are born to be auto mechanics (I met a young, observant woman who could change oil and rotate tires as well as any man). So, while justice must be uniform, chinuch – child rearing and education – must be individualized.

Rabbi Frand quotes the Nesivos Hamishpat which cites the latter half of Daniel 12:3, “…and they that turn many to righteousness like the stars for ever and ever,” interpreting it, as does the Talmud, as referring to teachers of young children. The Nesivos Hamishpat explains that this half of the verse must refer to teachers, whereas the first half of the verse, “and they that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament” refers to judges.

Teachers of young children are compared to stars because stars have different colors and levels of brightness. Like stars, teachers need to be able to teach to the student, allowing for special needs and motivations to help a child succeed. Judges are called upon to dispense the same justice for all, but teachers and parents need to tailor their approach for each child.

Every one of us is unique. Each has his own special talents, tastes, and manner of expression. Even groups of people that may seem alike at first glance are often a varied set of individuals. When Moshe took a census of the entire Jewish nation, he was careful to divide the census up into the different groups, tribes, and families that made up the one unified yet quite diverse nation. God made each of us different, and He wants us to make the most of ourselves by discovering and expressing our unique gifts.

If teachers and parents embraced each student and each child as a wonderful individual, there is a good chance each would come out as a star. If not, we can only fear the darkness.

See you Sunday-Shabbat Shalom

Love Yehuda Lave

Rabbi Yehuda Lave

Your mailing address

Contact Phone

Website

LIKE TWEET FORWARD

You received this email because you signed up on our website or made purchase from us.

Unsubscribe